Dan's conclusion followed from casting results cited in What's New? in the additional light of laxity observed in enforcement of coal mine safety and electricity generation emissions' abatement at retrofit plants.
Dan's poster board was bordered by arial graphics of baseball
parks: caps for California's 5 major league teams were awarded to passersby who
could identify a team and field from its arial graphic:

Conclusions refuted claims made about base load power production
resources, incumbent and challenger utility and customer benefit.
DH&A and Autopilot 2007 Version 3.5 TRUE/FALSE Claim #1: Gas
Combined Cycle is an economically feasible base load generation option for
California.

FALSE. Capacity Factors predicted for California never exceed
43%. They never exceed 39% for the U.S. and parts of Saskatchewan, Manitoba,
Ontario, Quebec, and New Brunswick that export to the lower 48.
DH&A and Autopilot 2007 Version 3.5 TRUE/FALSE Claim #2:
California should use the CCGT new generation price as a threshold price for
determining economic feasibility for new flash geothermal generation.
FALSE. The nomograph shown above and the attached
Geothermal Resources Council 2006 Annual Meeting paper by Dan tell the story.
CCGT is not an economically feasible base load generation
option, even though CalEnergy/MidAmerica, owner of the Salton Sea geothermal
resource base uses the CCGT new generation price as a threshold price for
determining economic feasibility. This substitutes base loaded coal imports
inframarginally for geothermal.
Further, SB1368 would require that the greenhouse gases emission
performance standard not exceed the rate of emissions of greenhouse gases for
combined-cycle natural gas, as defined, base load generation.
DH&A and Autopilot 2007 Version 3.5 TRUE/FALSE Claim #3: Coal
generation has nothing to do with the answers to 1 and 2, owing to the
accelerated RPS and CARB compliance.



FALSE. The accelerated RPS and CARB compliance export California
base load generation and pollution to coal plants in the Four Corners, Texas, and
other venues and vistas.
DH&A and Autopilot 2007 Version 3.5 TRUE/FALSE Claim #4: CCGT
generation is at least as profitable as is coal-fired generation - as the
wholesale base load power source for an incumbent household electricity retailer.
FALSE. There is no contest - whether you believe that in America,
service differentiation defines competition in markets

or, alternatively, that price-conscious consumers contrast
incumbent standard offer service with non-aggressive differentiation from other
retailers.

DH&A and Autopilot 2007 Version 3.5 TRUE/FALSE Claim #5: Owing
to efficiencies possible that exceed nameplate, CCGT generation supplying
wholesale base load power to a non-incumbent household retailer beats coal-fired
when the retailer and customer share a 2-way customer/ESP datacom with appliance
management for peak-to-base load shifting.

FALSE. Peak generation sources include hydro, CCGT, single cycle
gas turbines, and some renewable. The price differential for shifting load from
these sources to a natural gas-fired base load source is less than that for
shifting load from these sources to coal. Hence, 2-way customer/ESP datacom in
California exports pollution to the eastern venues supplying the electricity.
Please tell me what Batting Average is again for the first time!
Batting Average is a survival metric for a non-incumbent
electricity services provider. As in baseball, higher is better. In
shadowprice.com, higher than the LCOS means your portfolio selection mattered:
shadowprice.com solution values are based on cost, quality of service, and market
power residing in the expectations and behavior of service providers.
Your portfolio of services stays the same for every series game.
The Least-Cost-Of-Service provider’s portfolio varies randomly among 7 or 8
service bundles; however, according to rules you set on the bus stop screen,
shadowprice.com also selects random combinations of options from the service
bundles selected.
DH&A and Autopilot 2007 Version 3.5 TRUE/FALSE Claim #6:
No-frills household retail electricity service gains more customers when the base
load generation source is gas combined cycle than when the base load generation
source is coal.
FALSE. Under coal, the costs for peak power and service
differentiation comprise a larger fraction of customer service price than under
CCGT. This makes default or no-frills service more attractive in the relative
price terms which matter to customers. This is true when competition is aggressive
and price following/mergers behavior focuses on lowest power procurement costs.

This is true when competition is aggressive but price following/mergers
behavior focuses on target/partner's portfolio dominance.

This is true with an incumbent Standard Offer and non-aggressive
challengers - where price following/mergers behavior focuses on lowest power
procurement costs.

This is true with an incumbent Standard Offer and non-aggressive
challengers - where price following/mergers behavior focuses on target/partner's
portfolio dominance.

In an everything-the-same-but-base-load-power-cost regime
comparison, the low regime always yields more games of a 90-game series in which
no-frills service end-of-year market share exceeds 5% than does the high regime.
With one exception, the highest end-of-year market share for no-frills service
under the low base load power cost regime exceeds that under the high regime.
Master list of ball parks clockwise from lower left to lower right
1. PETCO Park, San Diego Padres
2. Polo Grounds, New York Giants
3. Great American Ball Park, Cincinnati Reds
4. Camden Yards, Baltimore Orioles
5. Ebbets Field, Brooklyn Dodgers
6. Dodger Stadium, Los Angeles Dodgers
7. Miller Park, Milwaukee Brewers
8. Angel Stadium of Anaheim, Los Angeles Angels
9. Yankee Stadium, New York Yankees
10. Wrigley Field, Chicago White Sox
11. Minute Maid Park, Houston Astros
12. McAfee Coliseum, Oakland Athletics
13. Blue Jays Stadium, Toronto
14. Turner Field, Atlanta Braves
15. Busch Stadium, Saint Louis Cardinals
16. Wrigley Field, Chicago Cubs
17. Tropicana Field, Tampa Bay Devil Rays
18. Bank One Ballpark, Arizona Diamondbacks
19. RFK Stadium, Washington Nationals
20. AT&T Park, San Francisco Giants
21. Jacobs Field, Cleveland Indians
22. Safeco Field, Seattle Mariners
23. Florida Marlins, Dolphin Stadium
24. Shea Stadium, New York Mets
25. Citizens Bank Park, Philadelphia Phillies
26. PNC Park, Pittsburgh Pirates
27. Ameriquest Field, Texas Rangers
28. Fenway Park, Boston Red Sox
29. Coors Field, Colorado Rockies
30. Kauffman Stadium, Kansas City Royals
31. Comerica Park, Detroit Tigers
32. H.H.H. Metrodome, Minnesota Twins
Dan can be reached at danhamblin@shadowprice.com.
|